Question. Your vehicle has quit working and it's the only 4 wheeler in the family. The wife digs out her one piece of jewelry worth anything and sells it to help out with the bills. The husband sits back like it is going to pay for it's self and doesn't lift one finger to dig out anything of his, sell it and put towards the bills.
What kind of man does this?
1. One that doesn't care
2. One that puts his collection before his family
3. One who doesn't really care for his wife
4. One who clearly doesn't want this to work!
He could load up any of his hundreds of comic books and sell them locally but NO HE WON'T!
Thanks Wesley for allowing me to see this side of you that NO ONE would believe! You have convinced me beyond a shadow of a doubt U DON"T CARE about our marriage or making a life together!!!
I really hope they keep you warm and cook your meals and washes your clothes, because soon I'll not be here for any of it, One Way Or Another!
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
A Terrorist by any name.
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/22/031/Illegal_Immigrants_Caught_Sabotaging_American_Train_Tracks.html
Monday, February 21, 2011
BURGJO and no dispatch sent out.
Good morning Chief Jordan.
I’m writing this because I feel the citizens are being denied the speedy response their taxes pay for. On Jan 4th 2011 at 14:18 hrs I called in an ATTP BURG JO with a complete description of the two suspects. As it was within 30 mins of shift change the dispatcher did not dispatch the call. I find this completely lacking professionalism on your departments behalf as it is a TPD rule the dispatcher followed.
THE RULE NEEDS TO BE CHANGED!!! Or at least have your Public Relations Officer tell the public how they will not receive service in certain time periods unless there is someone dying.
I guess I should have lied and called it in as BIP1 and not failed to pull the trigger, I‘ll bet I would have had a very timely response then. .
I am truly disgusted with the police dept over this matter!, and hopefully you are also. If the response to calls stop 30 mins before shift change then the pay should also STOP.
When I called back an hour later to cancel this call as not one unit responded the Call-taker seemed surprised then informed me “You need to call UDN for that Watch Order your requesting.” Not once did she say the call was still holding or anything.
I did as requested and then the officer didn’t even want a description of the suspects. This just boggles my mind and hopefully there is some remedial training going on!
Finally after 1700 hrs Officer GoForth called me back reference the WO and took the info. I can assure you I was tempted to stay awake all night and see just how many times a unit / any unit checked the area as requested. I wonder if making the statement “Do I call Chief Jordan or Channel 2 first” caused the call back at 1700 hrs.
Hopefully you will change this rule as it in no way benefit’s the citizens and simply increases the problems, or at least have the call-takers explain to the victim/s the response will be delayed because of this rule!.
It’s sad when there is more of a response on Facebook than your department.
After my letter to the Chief this was the letter sent to dispatch by one of their own...
Several people have asked for clarification on the procedures for dispatching calls close to shift change times. Tulsa Police Department maintains a policy specifically addressing this process (103B). Dispatch personnel, as well as officers, are NOT authorized to deviate from this policy without express supervisory authority from TPD. With few exceptions, even PSC supervisory staff will not change TPD policy without extenuating circumstance being present.
I encourage you to avoid knowingly violating this, or any other, policy without proper authorization. Violations of policy subject "YOU" to disciplinary action, not the unauthorized person who told you to do so. PROTECT YOURSELF!
Based on the following overview of TPD P&P 103B, dispatchers should NOT hold calls for any reason. Call assignment should continue up to shift change without authorization. PERIOD.
I highlighted the critical portions of the policy that mandate this practice.
TPD P&P 103B - POLICY
When a call is assigned to an officer, the officer is responsible for the proper disposition of the call including completion of any necessary reports. Disposition may include responding to the request for service, requesting reassignment of the call to another unit if field circumstances will delay the officer originally assigned from responding to the call in a reasonable length of time, or passing the call on to the unit's relief if the call is of a non-emergency nature and is assigned within the last fifteen (15) minutes of the shift.
Please note, TPD clearly places the responsibility for the call on the officers, not dispatchers.
TPD P&P 103B.9 - PROCEDURES
9. Officers may hold non-emergency calls if assigned within fifteen (15) minutes of the end of the shift. Officers originally assigned the call shall bear the responsibility for ensuring that all calls are handled in a proper manner. If not relieved promptly by the on-coming beat officer, the initially assigned officer shall pass the call to the on-coming supervisor for disposition.
I realize that some officers in the field may complain about a late call assignment (especially for lower priority calls). If they do, refer them to a supervisor.
If you have questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to ask. I remind everyone, while we are obligated to follow the policies and procedures of the agencies we serve, we don't write their policies . . . they do.
THANKS FOR ALL YOU DO!
Becky Eubanks
After-all this not one word from Ken White in apology for his departments total FU!, but what can one expect from one such as him. Now that I know Lynn Emery was the dispatcher in question it explains everything.
I’m writing this because I feel the citizens are being denied the speedy response their taxes pay for. On Jan 4th 2011 at 14:18 hrs I called in an ATTP BURG JO with a complete description of the two suspects. As it was within 30 mins of shift change the dispatcher did not dispatch the call. I find this completely lacking professionalism on your departments behalf as it is a TPD rule the dispatcher followed.
THE RULE NEEDS TO BE CHANGED!!! Or at least have your Public Relations Officer tell the public how they will not receive service in certain time periods unless there is someone dying.
I guess I should have lied and called it in as BIP1 and not failed to pull the trigger, I‘ll bet I would have had a very timely response then. .
I am truly disgusted with the police dept over this matter!, and hopefully you are also. If the response to calls stop 30 mins before shift change then the pay should also STOP.
When I called back an hour later to cancel this call as not one unit responded the Call-taker seemed surprised then informed me “You need to call UDN for that Watch Order your requesting.” Not once did she say the call was still holding or anything.
I did as requested and then the officer didn’t even want a description of the suspects. This just boggles my mind and hopefully there is some remedial training going on!
Finally after 1700 hrs Officer GoForth called me back reference the WO and took the info. I can assure you I was tempted to stay awake all night and see just how many times a unit / any unit checked the area as requested. I wonder if making the statement “Do I call Chief Jordan or Channel 2 first” caused the call back at 1700 hrs.
Hopefully you will change this rule as it in no way benefit’s the citizens and simply increases the problems, or at least have the call-takers explain to the victim/s the response will be delayed because of this rule!.
It’s sad when there is more of a response on Facebook than your department.
After my letter to the Chief this was the letter sent to dispatch by one of their own...
Several people have asked for clarification on the procedures for dispatching calls close to shift change times. Tulsa Police Department maintains a policy specifically addressing this process (103B). Dispatch personnel, as well as officers, are NOT authorized to deviate from this policy without express supervisory authority from TPD. With few exceptions, even PSC supervisory staff will not change TPD policy without extenuating circumstance being present.
I encourage you to avoid knowingly violating this, or any other, policy without proper authorization. Violations of policy subject "YOU" to disciplinary action, not the unauthorized person who told you to do so. PROTECT YOURSELF!
Based on the following overview of TPD P&P 103B, dispatchers should NOT hold calls for any reason. Call assignment should continue up to shift change without authorization. PERIOD.
I highlighted the critical portions of the policy that mandate this practice.
TPD P&P 103B - POLICY
When a call is assigned to an officer, the officer is responsible for the proper disposition of the call including completion of any necessary reports. Disposition may include responding to the request for service, requesting reassignment of the call to another unit if field circumstances will delay the officer originally assigned from responding to the call in a reasonable length of time, or passing the call on to the unit's relief if the call is of a non-emergency nature and is assigned within the last fifteen (15) minutes of the shift.
Please note, TPD clearly places the responsibility for the call on the officers, not dispatchers.
TPD P&P 103B.9 - PROCEDURES
9. Officers may hold non-emergency calls if assigned within fifteen (15) minutes of the end of the shift. Officers originally assigned the call shall bear the responsibility for ensuring that all calls are handled in a proper manner. If not relieved promptly by the on-coming beat officer, the initially assigned officer shall pass the call to the on-coming supervisor for disposition.
I realize that some officers in the field may complain about a late call assignment (especially for lower priority calls). If they do, refer them to a supervisor.
If you have questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to ask. I remind everyone, while we are obligated to follow the policies and procedures of the agencies we serve, we don't write their policies . . . they do.
THANKS FOR ALL YOU DO!
Becky Eubanks
After-all this not one word from Ken White in apology for his departments total FU!, but what can one expect from one such as him. Now that I know Lynn Emery was the dispatcher in question it explains everything.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Thursday, April 30, 2009
WHEN WILL IT END?
How many of you have been in the check-out line at a super-market and someone is ahead of you w/a basket filled so full someone has to keep a hand on top to stop the items from falling out? You notice the basket has as much if not more junk food ( chips, sugary drinks, and other such junk) as it does healthy food. Then you see a majority of the items are being paid for with food-stamps.
I have to tell you, it makes me really angry to see this waste of my tax dollars!
I haven’t a problem helping someone in need. But to pay for them to eat junk food, and serve this junk to their kids is more than a bit asinine. Then even more tax dollars are spent on free dental for the kids. Ever wonder if the cavities came from to much junk being eaten? W.I.C. controls what is bought on their program so why can’t some control be placed on food-stamps?
Many say, “over-hauling the system will cost millions”, I have to reply, “Not only will we have healthier children, millions will be saved in a very short time!”
Upset taxpayer
p.s. this was sent to President Obama, Rep Coburn & Inhofe.
I have to tell you, it makes me really angry to see this waste of my tax dollars!
I haven’t a problem helping someone in need. But to pay for them to eat junk food, and serve this junk to their kids is more than a bit asinine. Then even more tax dollars are spent on free dental for the kids. Ever wonder if the cavities came from to much junk being eaten? W.I.C. controls what is bought on their program so why can’t some control be placed on food-stamps?
Many say, “over-hauling the system will cost millions”, I have to reply, “Not only will we have healthier children, millions will be saved in a very short time!”
Upset taxpayer
p.s. this was sent to President Obama, Rep Coburn & Inhofe.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)